介绍：四名新生渴望在他们的第一次高中聚会上大放异彩但正如人们常说的，计划永远赶不上变化，麻烦总是难免。

介绍：Madrid, 1880. Elena Bianda is the most sought-after lady-in-waiting in the entire city. Despite her youth, more than 20 ladies have already had decent courtships and courtships under her tutelage. Her success lies in being rigid in morality with their families and sensitive to the concerns of the ladies. A complicated balance that Elena handles perfectly. She was born for it seeing them successfully walk down the aisle is, quite simply, her whole life. All this changes when she arrives at the Mencía house and has to take care of 3 sisters.

介绍：剧情故事的主人公是一对来自美国的兄弟，他们性格迥异，一个骄傲自大，奉行虚无主义，另一个则坦率正直，经常自省当兄弟俩来到遥远的泰国，在那里享受美酒、毒品与女人的时候，两人间的关系渐渐变得复杂起来……

介绍：丽兹（拉妲·米契尔 Radha Mitchell 饰）和皮特（John Dore 饰）结婚多年，两人之间的感情一直都十分要好，他们非常渴望拥有属于他们的后代，可遗憾的是，这个想法一直都没能够实现安迪（米歇尔·莫娜汉 Michelle Monaghan 饰）是丽兹最好的朋友，个性奔放的她在一次一夜情之后意外怀孕了，她决定生下这个孩子将他送给丽兹抚养，以圆好友的梦想。　　丽兹将这一消息告诉了皮特，没想到皮特的反应却并没有她想象中的那样开心，就在皮特半推半就的接受了这个孩子的同时，安迪就已经大大咧咧的住进了丽兹家中。不仅如此，皮特刚刚从戒毒所里出来的弟弟此时也搬进了丽兹家。

介绍：The subtitle of Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet’s first feature, from 1965, “Only Violence Helps Where Violence Reigns,” suggests the fierce political program evoked by their rigorous aesthetic. The pretext of the film, set in Cologne, is Heinrich Böll’s novel “Billiards at Half Past Nine,” which they strip down to a handful of stark events and film with a confrontational angularity akin to Bartók’s music that adorns the soundtrack. The subtlest of cues accompany the story’s complex flashbacks. The middle-aged Robert Fähmel tells a young hotel bellhop of persecutions under the Third Reich; his elderly father, Heinrich, an architect famed for a local abbey, recalls the militarism of the First World War, when his wife, Johanna, incurred trouble for insulting the Kaiser. A third-generation Fähmel is considering architecture, just as the exiled brother of Robert’s late wife, returns, only to be met by their former torturer, now a West German official taking part in a celebratory parade of war veterans. Straub and Huillet make the layers of history live in the present tense, which they judge severely. The tamped-down acting and the spare, tense visual rhetoric suggest a state of moral crisis as well as the response—as much in style as in substance—that it demands.