介绍：搬到一个新城镇后，一位年轻的大学生打算在乡村过一个悠闲的周末，但她很快发现自己并不孤单，并且需要为自己的生命而战

介绍：担当某广告公司主管职务的马科尔斯（Eddie Murphy 艾迪•墨菲 饰）是一位英俊潇洒、事业爱情双得意的黑人男子他的风度翩翩和温文尔雅是无数妙龄女郎投怀送抱，也正因为如此，马科尔斯与每位女郎的爱情犹如暴风骤雨一般来的激烈，却很快无影无踪。　　不久他所在的公司与别家企业合并，新来的女上司杰奎琳（Robin Givens 萝宾•吉文斯 饰）性感迷人，马科尔斯将其所定为下一个目标。很快两人一拍即合，但在一夜欢愉之后，他却如曾经那些被他抛弃的女郎一样被杰奎琳抛弃。这令马科尔斯备受打击，事业急转直下……

介绍：沃尔特马修在片中饰演了一名叫特拉布柯的职业杀手他接到任务要在拉迪去法院出庭作证时将其杀死灭口。当特拉布柯从法院大楼外他准备下手的地点离开回旅馆的途中，遇到了沮丧的维克多克鲁尼（Jack Lemmon饰），为他的妻子赛丽亚（Paula Prentiss饰）为了一个奇怪的加利福尼亚州性诊所的所长离他而去而悲痛不已。特拉布柯回到旅馆房间并把来复枪安顿好。但住在隔壁的维克多扰得他心神不宁。维克多试图将自己吊死在房间里。特拉布柯弄断了维克多上吊用的绳子，不料维克多由爬到了窗外准备跳楼自杀。为劝回维克多，特拉布柯只得同意陪同维克多去加州找他的妻子。二人来到诊所，发现妻子已经不可救药的爱上了奇怪的医生雅克布洛特，并正准备提起离婚诉讼。维克多决定回旅馆继续自杀，赛丽亚和医生也暗中尾随而至，计划给维克多注射一针镇定剂，却阴差阳错地将针头插进了特拉布柯地身上。特拉布柯将自己刺杀拉迪的任务告诉了维克多，维克多打消了自杀念头，决定帮他完成刺杀任务。

介绍：本片由五个发生在同一时间，不同国家地区的小故事组成，每个故事都描述了的士司机与乘客的一次短暂遭遇　　洛杉矶晚上707，假小子司机柯基（薇诺娜·瑞德 Winona Ryder 饰）载着她的客人维多利亚（吉娜·罗兰兹 Gena Rowlands 饰）回酒店，恰巧负责电影选角的维多利亚看中了柯基，然而柯基却告诉她自己想成为一名机械师……　　纽约晚上1007，黑人青年尤尤终于拦到了一辆的士，却发现司机是一名根本不会开车且语言不通的外国老人赫尔穆特（阿明·缪勒-斯塔尔 Armin Mueller-Stahl 饰），尤尤只好主动提出由他来开车……　　巴黎凌晨407，年轻的黑人司机把两名出言侮辱他的非洲乘客撵下车后，上来了一位美貌的盲女（碧翠斯·黛尔 Béatrice Dalle 饰），他立即对她产生了好奇与怜悯，却发现她比自己更能在这世界上辨明方向。　　……　　本片由贾木许自编、自导、自制而成，他在大约八天内完成了剧本创作，各个故事发生的地点则根据他想合作的演员而定。电影原声带则来自于他的老拍档民谣大师Tom Waits。

介绍：Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'　　By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.　　Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.　　One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.　　While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.　　Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...