介绍：故事发生在遥远的古代，名叫瑟拉多（安迪·吉雷 Andy Gillet 饰）的牧羊人和名叫阿斯特蕾（斯蒂芬妮·克雷恩考尔 Stéphanie Crayencour 饰）的牧羊女相爱了，两人的爱情炙热而真诚，他们都视彼此为今生的唯一不幸的是，由于听信了谣言，阿斯特蕾误以为瑟拉多另有新欢。伤心欲绝的阿斯特蕾发誓再也不愿见到瑟拉多。　　失去了阿斯特蕾的瑟拉多悲痛万分，只想匆匆了却此生，没想到，企图投河自尽的他被仙女救起。求死不成，瑟拉多重新感受到了自己对于阿斯特蕾的爱意，可是永不相见的誓言已经许下，面对这铁一般的桎梏，瑟拉多能够重新见到阿斯特蕾吗？又将有多少艰难险阻在道路上等待着他呢？

介绍：当giulia遇到libero并和他在一起的时候，giulia 发现还有不一样的命运和生活在等待着她但是一个选择直接导致了她被这个世界所背弃

介绍：绰号“LUCKY”的葛蓝是一名出色的战斗机飞行员，但他厌倦了血与火的生活，于是申请从空军退役，任职于一家航空公司　　然而，民航飞行员的生涯也不是一帆风顺的。一次他飞行途中刚刚升空就遇上乱流，导致客机与一架直升机凌空相撞，一个引擎报废，机身严重受损并失去平衡，虽然不至于立即坠毁，但只能向上爬升不能下降。　　一切是这样措手不及，燃料却只剩下两小时，在这短短的时间里他要经历一生中最大的挑战，319名乘客的性命完全操纵在他的手上……　　无奈之中，地面控制中心请求空军派遣一架空中加油机协助救援，军机也唯有冒险一试：先扫射客机尾翼，使其停止继续爬升，然后通过加油管道向客机机头注水，试图恢复机身平衡。　　在这期间，葛蓝和客机的空乘人员们要面临机身破损失压、氧气不足、机舱气温急剧下降的巨大风险……　　他们能否从地狱门口平安返航，降落人间呢……

介绍：本片由五个发生在同一时间，不同国家地区的小故事组成，每个故事都描述了的士司机与乘客的一次短暂遭遇　　洛杉矶晚上707，假小子司机柯基（薇诺娜·瑞德 Winona Ryder 饰）载着她的客人维多利亚（吉娜·罗兰兹 Gena Rowlands 饰）回酒店，恰巧负责电影选角的维多利亚看中了柯基，然而柯基却告诉她自己想成为一名机械师……　　纽约晚上1007，黑人青年尤尤终于拦到了一辆的士，却发现司机是一名根本不会开车且语言不通的外国老人赫尔穆特（阿明·缪勒-斯塔尔 Armin Mueller-Stahl 饰），尤尤只好主动提出由他来开车……　　巴黎凌晨407，年轻的黑人司机把两名出言侮辱他的非洲乘客撵下车后，上来了一位美貌的盲女（碧翠斯·黛尔 Béatrice Dalle 饰），他立即对她产生了好奇与怜悯，却发现她比自己更能在这世界上辨明方向。　　……　　本片由贾木许自编、自导、自制而成，他在大约八天内完成了剧本创作，各个故事发生的地点则根据他想合作的演员而定。电影原声带则来自于他的老拍档民谣大师Tom Waits。

介绍：Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'　　By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.　　Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.　　One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.　　While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.　　Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...